advertisement
8 January 2024
Artificial turf offers undeniable advantages, especially in water-scarce regions like Arizona, where it conserves this precious resource. However, beneath the surface of vibrant green lawns lie environmental concerns that are causing scientists to raise their eyebrows. While many local facilities, including football fields, playgrounds, and residences, have already embraced artificial turf, the mass adoption of this synthetic alternative could lead to unforeseen ecological problems.
A recent study by the National Nonprofit Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) has brought troubling issues to light. Artificial turf has been found to release per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often referred to as “forever chemicals,” into the soil and adjacent wetlands or water bodies. This release poses serious environmental risks.
Furthermore, artificial turf creates an impervious surface that hinders the natural soil’s ability to support insects and breathe. This surface significantly raises ground temperatures, contributing to localized heat islands, which can become so scorching that they have been known to melt tennis shoes.
Studies also reveal that the water required to cool artificial turf on a hot day can surpass the water needs of certain natural grasses in similar conditions. Unfortunately, this cooling effect is transient, lasting just around 20 minutes. Moreover, artificial turf sheds plastic fibers into the environment as a source of plastic pollution. Recent research found that more than 15% of mesoplastics and macroplastics in nearby bodies of water were composed of artificial turf fibers.
Adding to the concerns, PFAS have been detected in artificial turf. Originally discovered in 2019 by PEER and The Ecology Center, these chemicals serve various purposes in artificial turf production, including aiding plastic extrusion and enhancing resistance to heat, stains, and water. Due to their resilient carbon-fluorine bonds, PFAS are categorized as “forever chemicals” and do not readily degrade in the environment.
PFAS have been associated with a range of health issues, including cancer, developmental problems in infants and children, fertility and pregnancy complications, disruption of human hormones, and immune system disorders. These immune system effects are particularly disconcerting in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Extensive toxicity studies have consistently linked PFAS to these adverse health outcomes.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed regulatory limits for six PFAS, asserting that there is no safe dose for PFOA and PFOS in drinking water. Artificial turf poses a multifaceted problem by exposing athletes and children who play on these surfaces to PFAS through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption. Furthermore, PFAS leach into surrounding waters, potentially contaminating drinking water supplies.
In response to these alarming findings, PEER has initiated a national campaign advocating for the ban of artificial turf to safeguard public health and protect the environment. Collaborating with scientists, school authorities, and concerned parents, this effort seeks to address these critical issues posed by artificial turf.
advertisement
A recent WalletHub study has ranked Arizona as one of the least charitable states in the U.S., placing it 49th in overall charitable behavior. The study, which examined 17 factors, including volunteer rates, donations, and the number of food banks per capita, revealed Arizona’s low charitable standing. While the state ranked poorly, neighboring states like Utah and Colorado performed much better, securing spots in the top 10. Although Arizona lags behind, the U.S. as a whole remains one of the most charitable nations globally, with American donors contributing nearly $560 billion to charity in 2023, according to the World Giving
A recent study from WalletHub named this small city the best small city in Arizona, and it may not be one you might expect. While many of the Grand Canyon State’s charming small cities—such as Flagstaff, Sedona, and Jerome are beloved for their picturesque views and inviting downtown areas, this study focused on key factors like affordability, economic health, education and health, quality of life, and safety. Despite Arizona’s small cities not making it to the top 10 in the U.S., Queen Creek emerged as the best small city in Arizona, according to the WalletHub study. Why Queen Creek is
Phoenix homeowners now have the chance to transform their yards and contribute to water conservation efforts through the Residential Grass Removal Program. With this initiative, Phoenix pays eligible homeowners $2 for every square foot of grass they remove, helping them switch to more sustainable desert landscaping. advertisement Why Desert Landscaping? In the arid climate of Phoenix, water conservation is crucial. Lawns, which require significant amounts of water, are a major contributor to household water usage. By replacing grass with desert-friendly, drought-resistant plants, homeowners can reduce water consumption by up to 85% compared to maintaining a grass lawn. Not only does
Research indicates that the likelihood of being diagnosed with dementia can be influenced by where individuals live. Insights from Researchers Dr. Julie Bynum, the lead researcher from the University of Michigan, stated that “the percentage of individuals over 65 diagnosed in Arizona is low compared to the national average.” She has dedicated years to examining the prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia across the United States. Bynum further noted that “regardless of demographic factors such as race or age, where one lives plays a crucial role in their likelihood of receiving a diagnosis.” advertisement Contrasts in Diagnosis
